Messages in this thread | | | Date | Mon, 16 May 2011 23:41:08 -0400 | From | Douglas Gilbert <> | Subject | Re: [GIT PULL] isci merge candidate |
| |
On 11-05-16 08:47 PM, Jeff Garzik wrote: > On Mon, May 16, 2011 at 8:39 PM, Dan Williams<dan.j.williams@intel.com> wrote: >> At a minimum It would require a more verbose interface to >> libsas/libata (or new libframe?) to allow us to deliver raw >> unsolicited frames into common protocol handlers. > > ...which is where SAS and SATA have been heading for a while, anyway. > With chained SAS expander setup you have a network, if an annoying, > manually configured and routed one. Over that network you deliver > frames of various types.
For SAS-2 expanders, edit the above to: s/manually/self/
Doug Gilbert
| |