Messages in this thread |  | | Date | Mon, 16 May 2011 14:39:30 +0200 | | From | Jan Kratochvil <> | | Subject | Re: waitpid(WNOHANG) should report SIGCHLD-notified signals [Re: [PATCH 09/11] job control: reorganize wait_task_stopped()] |
| |
Hi Tejun,
On Mon, 16 May 2011 14:27:56 +0200, Tejun Heo wrote: > On Mon, May 16, 2011 at 02:11:16PM +0200, Jan Kratochvil wrote: > > It cannot as various GDB-supported platforms do not support threads properly. > > And you want to have a common codebase to get it will supported. > > > > Besides that it is a matter of coding style, I perfer "poll() model" even on > > threads-supporting GNU/Linux. > > The above wouldn't be linux kernel's top design concerns, right?
They are - as without threads one needs reliable WNOHANG - while which you say it is not reliable.
> It's not like new interface is gonna break that, but I think it's gonna be > more fragile. Well, it shouldn't be worse than now.
BTW I really do not think this WNOHANG issue is anyhow related to this whole discussion.
Thanks, Jan
|  |