lkml.org 
[lkml]   [2011]   [May]   [15]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
 
Messages in this thread
/
Date
From
Subjectany value in centralizing a defn of "RUN_AT()"?

i notice that a number of drivers duplicate a macro definition of
RUN_AT():

drivers/staging/vt6655/device.h:#define RUN_AT(x) (jiffies+(x))
drivers/net/irda/au1k_ir.c:#define RUN_AT(x) (jiffies + (x))
drivers/net/hamachi.c:#define RUN_AT(x) (jiffies + (x))
drivers/net/tulip/tulip.h:#define RUN_AT(x) (jiffies + (x))
drivers/net/wireless/airo.c:#define RUN_AT(x) (jiffies+(x))
drivers/net/rrunner.c:#define RUN_AT(x) (jiffies + (x))
drivers/net/bnx2.c:#define RUN_AT(x) (jiffies + (x))
drivers/net/3c59x.c:#define RUN_AT(x) (jiffies + (x))
drivers/net/fealnx.c:#define RUN_AT(x) (jiffies + (x))

etc, etc. any value in just defining that once in jiffies.h and
letting everyone use that?

rday

--

========================================================================
Robert P. J. Day Ottawa, Ontario, CANADA
http://crashcourse.ca

Twitter: http://twitter.com/rpjday
LinkedIn: http://ca.linkedin.com/in/rpjday
========================================================================


\
 
 \ /
  Last update: 2011-05-15 22:21    [W:0.043 / U:14.292 seconds]
©2003-2020 Jasper Spaans|hosted at Digital Ocean and TransIP|Read the blog|Advertise on this site