lkml.org 
[lkml]   [2011]   [May]   [14]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
 
Messages in this thread
/
Date
SubjectRe: pm loss development
From
> I read the patches.  My question was about the general idea of who should
> be responsible of making these decisions.

The best should be, I think, to have some guidelines and than the
possibility to choose the best policy for each situation.
In my board I needed to shutdown video in capture and demodulator
circuit, so I have implemented vpfe capture switch off, that does
stream_off to all its v4l2 subdevices (a pal decoder and a video
demodulator).
So I can save 30mA, and it allows to my board to survive longer.
I need to do some tests and have some data with and without PM loss.

Bye,
raffaele
--
www.opensurf.it
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/

\
 
 \ /
  Last update: 2011-05-14 22:25    [W:0.115 / U:0.192 seconds]
©2003-2020 Jasper Spaans|hosted at Digital Ocean and TransIP|Read the blog|Advertise on this site