lkml.org 
[lkml]   [2011]   [May]   [13]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
 
Messages in this thread
    /
    SubjectRe: 答复: problem with kmemleak
    From
    Date
    On Fri, 2011-05-13 at 10:32 +0100, ttlxzz ccc wrote:
    > I have tested kmemleak on the x86 and x86_64 architecture again. There
    > is only
    > backtrace:
    >
    > [<ffffffffffffffff>] 0xffffffffffffffff
    >
    > unreferenced object 0xffffc90012d27000 (size 64):
    >
    > comm "insmod", pid 13092, jiffies 4298369684
    >
    > hex dump (first 32 bytes):
    >
    > 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 ................
    >
    > 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 ................
    >
    > backtrace:
    >
    > [<ffffffffffffffff>] 0xffffffffffffffff
    >
    > But in the x86, there is full backtrace.

    Can you enable CONFIG_BACKTRACE_SELF_TEST and check whether the
    boot-time backtrace test goes ok?

    --
    Catalin




    \
     
     \ /
      Last update: 2011-05-13 16:11    [W:0.021 / U:32.036 seconds]
    ©2003-2016 Jasper Spaans. hosted at Digital OceanAdvertise on this site