[lkml]   [2011]   [May]   [13]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
Messages in this thread
SubjectRe: [GIT PULL rcu/next] rcu commits for 2.6.40

* Ingo Molnar <> wrote:

> I started bisecting this, and the two relevant endpoints:
> bad: 11c476f: net,rcu: convert call_rcu(prl_entry_destroy_rcu) to kfree
> good: 0ee5623f: Linux 2.6.39-rc6
> very clearly indicate that this is an RCU regression.

This might be the same one Yinghai found:

e59fb3120bec: rcu: Decrease memory-barrier usage based on semi-formal proof

So with the config i sent it's definitely reproducible.

At first sight couldnt this be related not to barriers, but to not setting
need_resched() like we did before?



 \ /
  Last update: 2011-05-13 15:15    [from the cache]
©2003-2014 Jasper Spaans. hosted at Digital Ocean