lkml.org 
[lkml]   [2011]   [May]   [12]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
 
Messages in this thread
/
SubjectRe: [patch v2 0/5] percpu_counter: bug fix and enhancement
From
Date
Le jeudi 12 mai 2011 à 11:02 +0200, Eric Dumazet a écrit :
> Le jeudi 12 mai 2011 à 10:59 +0200, Tejun Heo a écrit :
> > Hello,
> >
> > On Thu, May 12, 2011 at 04:55:20PM +0800, Shaohua Li wrote:
> > > sure, but it's quite difficult to determine a @maxfuzzy in his proposal
> > > I thought (and could confuse user), did I miss anything?
> >
> > I don't think @maxfuzzy is necessary there. I wrote this before but
> > why can't we track the actual deviation instead of the number of
> > deviation events?
> >
>
> Thats roughly same thing (BATCH multiplicator factor apart)
>
> Most percpu_counter users for a given percpu_counter object use a given
> BATCH, dont they ?
>
>


I guess nr_cpu_ids would be a nice @maxfuzzy default value...



--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/

\
 
 \ /
  Last update: 2011-05-12 11:05    [from the cache]
©2003-2011 Jasper Spaans