lkml.org 
[lkml]   [2011]   [May]   [12]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
 
Messages in this thread
    /
    SubjectRe: [patch v2 0/5] percpu_counter: bug fix and enhancement
    From
    Date
    Le jeudi 12 mai 2011 à 11:02 +0200, Eric Dumazet a écrit :
    > Le jeudi 12 mai 2011 à 10:59 +0200, Tejun Heo a écrit :
    > > Hello,
    > >
    > > On Thu, May 12, 2011 at 04:55:20PM +0800, Shaohua Li wrote:
    > > > sure, but it's quite difficult to determine a @maxfuzzy in his proposal
    > > > I thought (and could confuse user), did I miss anything?
    > >
    > > I don't think @maxfuzzy is necessary there. I wrote this before but
    > > why can't we track the actual deviation instead of the number of
    > > deviation events?
    > >
    >
    > Thats roughly same thing (BATCH multiplicator factor apart)
    >
    > Most percpu_counter users for a given percpu_counter object use a given
    > BATCH, dont they ?
    >
    >


    I guess nr_cpu_ids would be a nice @maxfuzzy default value...



    --
    To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
    the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
    More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
    Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/

    \
     
     \ /
      Last update: 2011-05-12 11:05    [W:0.021 / U:30.100 seconds]
    ©2003-2016 Jasper Spaans. hosted at Digital OceanAdvertise on this site