[lkml]   [2011]   [May]   [11]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
Messages in this thread
SubjectRe: [patch v2 0/5] percpu_counter: bug fix and enhancement
Hey, Shaohua.

On Wed, May 11, 2011 at 04:10:12PM +0800, Shaohua Li wrote:
> The new implementation uses lglock to protect percpu data. Each cpu has its
> private lock while other cpu doesn't take. In this way _add doesn't need take
> global lock anymore and remove the deviation. This still gives me about
> about 5x ~ 6x faster (not that faster than the original 7x faster, but still
> good) with the workload mentioned in patch 4.

I'm afraid I'm not too thrilled about lglock + atomic64 usage. It is
a very patchy approach which addresses a very specific use case which
might just need a higher @batch. I just can't see enough benefits to
justify the overhead and complexity. :-(



 \ /
  Last update: 2011-05-11 18:59    [W:0.121 / U:0.088 seconds]
©2003-2018 Jasper Spaans|hosted at Digital Ocean and TransIP|Read the blog|Advertise on this site