lkml.org 
[lkml]   [2011]   [Apr]   [6]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
 
Messages in this thread
/
Date
From
SubjectRe: About lock-less data structure patches
On 04/06/2011 09:48 AM, Mathieu Desnoyers wrote:
> * huang ying (huang.ying.caritas@gmail.com) wrote:
[snip]
>>>>
>>>> OK. I will change the comments, adding these semantics explanation.
>>>> The user should be warned :)
>>>
>>> Yes, that makes sense. After this generalization step, if you're ok with
>>> this, we could aim at moving the implementation from a stack to a queue
>>> and provide fifo semantic rather than lifo, so that other users (e.g.
>>> call_rcu in the kernel) can start benefiting from it.
>>
>> I think that is good to move from stack to queue.
>>
>> I will send out changed lock-less data structure patchset soon. And
>> we can continue to work on the new lock-less queue at the same time.
>
> Sounds like a very good plan! Thanks!

Maybe you can send out your lock-less queue patches, so we can work on that.

Best Regards,
Huang Ying


\
 
 \ /
  Last update: 2011-04-07 22:53    [W:1.041 / U:0.584 seconds]
©2003-2020 Jasper Spaans|hosted at Digital Ocean and TransIP|Read the blog|Advertise on this site