Messages in this thread | | | Date | Mon, 4 Apr 2011 12:29:47 +0200 | Subject | Re: [PATCH] ubifs: Use empty_iops and empty_fops consistently | From | Sedat Dilek <> |
| |
On Mon, Apr 4, 2011 at 12:06 PM, Artem Bityutskiy <dedekind1@gmail.com> wrote: > On Mon, 2011-04-04 at 11:38 +0200, Sedat Dilek wrote: >> Sorry for having flooded your inbox. > > That's ok! :-) I think I did not look carefully enough. Your patch is > just an additional clean-up which makes the names to be consistent. I > can pick it, but probably it is better if it goes in with the > 'empty_aops' changes? Whatever you prefer. >
I dunno the internal organization between block-tree and fs-sub-tree maintainers. As I was in contact first with Jens in this issue, it might be a good idea to let this patch go through his block-tree.
- Sedat -
| |