lkml.org 
[lkml]   [2011]   [Apr]   [4]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
 
Messages in this thread
/
Date
From
SubjectRe: [PATCH 05/10] Core checkpoint/restart support code
Quoting Andrew Morton (akpm@linux-foundation.org):
> On Mon, 4 Apr 2011 11:27:53 -0500 "Serge E. Hallyn" <serge@hallyn.com> wrote:
>
> > Andrew (Cc:d), did you see this thread go by, and it did it look
> > in any way more palatable to you? Have you had any thoughts on
> > checkpoint/restart in the last few months? Or did that horse quietly
> > die over winter?
>
> argh, it was the victim of LIFO.
>
> All I can say at this stage is that I'll be interested next time it
> comes past, sorry.

Thanks, that's good to know.

As you know, we started with a minimal patchset, then grew it over time
to answer the "but how will you (xyz) without uglifying the kernel".
Would you recommend we go back to keeping a separate minimal patchset,
or that we develop on the current, pretty feature-full version? I'm not
convinced believe there will be bandwidth to keep two trees and do both
justice.

thanks,
-serge
[unhandled content-type:application/pgp-signature]
\
 
 \ /
  Last update: 2011-04-04 20:53    [W:0.776 / U:0.112 seconds]
©2003-2020 Jasper Spaans|hosted at Digital Ocean and TransIP|Read the blog|Advertise on this site