lkml.org 
[lkml]   [2011]   [Apr]   [26]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
 
Messages in this thread
/
Date
From
SubjectRe: readahead and oom
On Tue, 26 Apr 2011 17:20:29 +0800
Wu Fengguang <fengguang.wu@intel.com> wrote:

> Pass __GFP_NORETRY|__GFP_NOWARN for readahead page allocations.
>
> readahead page allocations are completely optional. They are OK to
> fail and in particular shall not trigger OOM on themselves.

I have distinct recollections of trying this many years ago, finding
that it caused problems then deciding not to do it. But I can't find
an email trail and I don't remember the reasons :(

If the system is so stressed for memory that the oom-killer might get
involved then the readahead pages may well be getting reclaimed before
the application actually gets to use them. But that's just an aside.

Ho hum. The patch *seems* good (as it did 5-10 years ago ;)) but there
may be surprising side-effects which could be exposed under heavy
testing. Testing which I'm sure hasn't been performed...




\
 
 \ /
  Last update: 2011-04-26 21:53    [W:0.093 / U:3.092 seconds]
©2003-2018 Jasper Spaans|hosted at Digital Ocean and TransIP|Read the blog|Advertise on this site