Messages in this thread Patch in this message | | | Date | Mon, 25 Apr 2011 22:04:16 +0200 | From | Willy Tarreau <> | Subject | [PATCH 104/173] Prevent rt_sigqueueinfo and rt_tgsigqueueinfo from spoofing the signal code |
| |
2.6.27.59-stable review patch. If anyone has any objections, please let us know.
------------------
From: Julien Tinnes <jln@google.com>
commit da48524eb20662618854bb3df2db01fc65f3070c upstream.
Userland should be able to trust the pid and uid of the sender of a signal if the si_code is SI_TKILL.
Unfortunately, the kernel has historically allowed sigqueueinfo() to send any si_code at all (as long as it was negative - to distinguish it from kernel-generated signals like SIGILL etc), so it could spoof a SI_TKILL with incorrect siginfo values.
Happily, it looks like glibc has always set si_code to the appropriate SI_QUEUE, so there are probably no actual user code that ever uses anything but the appropriate SI_QUEUE flag.
So just tighten the check for si_code (we used to allow any negative value), and add a (one-time) warning in case there are binaries out there that might depend on using other si_code values.
Signed-off-by: Julien Tinnes <jln@google.com> Acked-by: Oleg Nesterov <oleg@redhat.com> Signed-off-by: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org> Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@suse.de> [wt: 2.6.27 does not have do_rt_tgsigqueueinfo()]
--- kernel/signal.c | 16 ++++++++++++---- 1 file changed, 12 insertions(+), 4 deletions(-)
Index: longterm-2.6.27/kernel/signal.c =================================================================== --- longterm-2.6.27.orig/kernel/signal.c 2011-01-23 10:52:37.000000000 +0100 +++ longterm-2.6.27/kernel/signal.c 2011-04-25 16:06:27.491278774 +0200 @@ -2294,9 +2294,13 @@ return -EFAULT; /* Not even root can pretend to send signals from the kernel. - Nor can they impersonate a kill(), which adds source info. */ - if (info.si_code >= 0) + * Nor can they impersonate a kill()/tgkill(), which adds source info. + */ + if (info.si_code != SI_QUEUE) { + /* We used to allow any < 0 si_code */ + WARN_ON_ONCE(info.si_code < 0); return -EPERM; + } info.si_signo = sig; /* POSIX.1b doesn't mention process groups. */
| |