[lkml]   [2011]   [Apr]   [22]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
Messages in this thread
SubjectRe: [generalized cache events] Re: [PATCH 1/1] perf tools: Add missing user space support for config1/config2
> One could argue that all you need is cycles and instructions. If there is an
> expensive load, you'll see that the load instruction takes many cycles and
> you can infer that it's a cache miss.

That is when you can actually recognize which of the last load instructions
caused the problem. Often skid on Out of order CPUs makes this very hard to
identify which actual load caused the the long stall (or if they all stalled)

There's a way around it of course using advanced events, but not with

> I don't see why exposing all vendor defined events is harmful

Simple: without vendor events you cannot answer a lot of questions.


-- -- Speaking for myself only

 \ /
  Last update: 2011-04-22 19:03    [W:0.117 / U:1.060 seconds]
©2003-2018 Jasper Spaans|hosted at Digital Ocean and TransIP|Read the blog|Advertise on this site