[lkml]   [2011]   [Apr]   [21]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
Messages in this thread
    SubjectRe: [PATCH 0/6] writeback: moving expire targets for background/kupdate works
    Hi Wu,

    if you're queueing up writeback changes can you look into splitting
    inode_wb_list_lock as it was done in earlier versions of the inode
    scalability patches? Especially if we don't get the I/O less
    balance_dirty_pages in ASAP it'll at least allows us to scale the
    busy waiting for the list manipulationes to one CPU per BDI.

     \ /
      Last update: 2011-04-21 06:37    [W:0.043 / U:1.288 seconds]
    ©2003-2016 Jasper Spaans. hosted at Digital OceanAdvertise on this site