[lkml]   [2011]   [Apr]   [21]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
Messages in this thread
SubjectRe: [PATCH 0/6] writeback: moving expire targets for background/kupdate works
Hi Wu,

if you're queueing up writeback changes can you look into splitting
inode_wb_list_lock as it was done in earlier versions of the inode
scalability patches? Especially if we don't get the I/O less
balance_dirty_pages in ASAP it'll at least allows us to scale the
busy waiting for the list manipulationes to one CPU per BDI.

 \ /
  Last update: 2011-04-21 06:37    [W:0.111 / U:15.572 seconds]
©2003-2018 Jasper Spaans|hosted at Digital Ocean and TransIP|Read the blog|Advertise on this site