Messages in this thread Patch in this message | | | From | Tao Ma <> | Subject | [PATCH] block: Remove the extra check in queue_requests_store. | Date | Tue, 19 Apr 2011 16:26:57 +0800 |
| |
From: Tao Ma <boyu.mt@taobao.com>
In queue_requests_store, the code looks like if (rl->count[BLK_RW_SYNC] >= q->nr_requests) { blk_set_queue_full(q, BLK_RW_SYNC); } else if (rl->count[BLK_RW_SYNC]+1 <= q->nr_requests) { blk_clear_queue_full(q, BLK_RW_SYNC); wake_up(&rl->wait[BLK_RW_SYNC]); } If we don't satify the situation of "if", we can get that rl->count[BLK_RW_SYNC} < q->nr_quests. It is the same as rl->count[BLK_RW_SYNC]+1 <= q->nr_requests. All the "else" should satisfy the "else if" check so it isn't needed actually.
Signed-off-by: Tao Ma <boyu.mt@taobao.com> --- block/blk-sysfs.c | 4 ++-- 1 files changed, 2 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
diff --git a/block/blk-sysfs.c b/block/blk-sysfs.c index 6d73512..644e2d3 100644 --- a/block/blk-sysfs.c +++ b/block/blk-sysfs.c @@ -66,14 +66,14 @@ queue_requests_store(struct request_queue *q, const char *page, size_t count) if (rl->count[BLK_RW_SYNC] >= q->nr_requests) { blk_set_queue_full(q, BLK_RW_SYNC); - } else if (rl->count[BLK_RW_SYNC]+1 <= q->nr_requests) { + } else { blk_clear_queue_full(q, BLK_RW_SYNC); wake_up(&rl->wait[BLK_RW_SYNC]); } if (rl->count[BLK_RW_ASYNC] >= q->nr_requests) { blk_set_queue_full(q, BLK_RW_ASYNC); - } else if (rl->count[BLK_RW_ASYNC]+1 <= q->nr_requests) { + } else { blk_clear_queue_full(q, BLK_RW_ASYNC); wake_up(&rl->wait[BLK_RW_ASYNC]); } -- 1.6.3.GIT
| |