Messages in this thread | | | Subject | Re: Q. locking order of dcache_lru_lock | From | Peter Zijlstra <> | Date | Mon, 11 Apr 2011 14:41:24 +0200 |
| |
On Mon, 2011-04-11 at 21:33 +0900, J. R. Okajima wrote: > Peter Zijlstra: > > Not really a problem, locking order is simply a tool/scheme to avoid > > deadlocks. Since there is no deadlock potential its fine to 'violate' > > locking order. > > I see. > Then lockdep always ignore all tyrlocks?
For tracking dependencies, yes. It does register we hold the lock when the trylock is successful.
| |