Messages in this thread | | | From | Arnd Bergmann <> | Subject | Re: [GIT PULL] omap changes for v2.6.39 merge window | Date | Fri, 1 Apr 2011 13:32:35 +0200 |
| |
On Thursday 31 March 2011, Thomas Gleixner wrote: > On Thu, 31 Mar 2011, Arnd Bergmann wrote: > > Right, but the problem starts in way simpler areas like irq chips and > gpio stuff, where lots of the IP cores are similar and trivial enough > to be shared across many SoC families.
Yes, I'm sure that there are more obvious examples than the ones I've given, those were just the ones that I had noticed myself.
> Even the OMAP "consolidated" code is silly: > > But the code above has 6 cases in the switch because nobody abstracted > it out consequently. Not to talk about the ifdef mess.
Nice illustration.
Arnd
| |