lkml.org 
[lkml]   [2011]   [Mar]   [9]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
 
Messages in this thread
/
Date
From
SubjectRe: [PATCH, RESEND] Putting the device into runtime suspend after resume()/probe() is handled
On Wed, 09 Mar 2011 12:39:34 +0000
Alan Cox <alan@lxorguk.ukuu.org.uk> wrote:

> From: Alan Cox <alan@lxorguk.ukuu.org.uk>
> To: akpm@linux-foundation.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
> Subject: [PATCH, RESEND] Putting the device into runtime suspend after resume()/probe() is handled
> Date: Wed, 09 Mar 2011 12:39:34 +0000
> User-Agent: StGIT/0.14.3
>
> From: Hong Liu <hong.liu@intel.com>
>
> by the PM core and the device core code. No need to manually add them in
> each single driver. And correct the runtime state in remove().
>
> Signed-off-by: Hong Liu <hong.liu@intel.com>
> Signed-off-by: Alan Cox <alan@linux.intel.com>

I'd merged this a while back but was awaiting info on why v1 had a
cc:stable so the changelog could be updated to indicate why a -stable
backport was needed.

I see that the cc:stable has been removed so that settles that. But
it's still unclear how serious the bugs-which-were fixed are. Oh well,
a bug's a bug. I put it in my 2.6.38 queue anyway.


\
 
 \ /
  Last update: 2011-03-09 22:55    [W:0.045 / U:0.036 seconds]
©2003-2020 Jasper Spaans|hosted at Digital Ocean and TransIP|Read the blog|Advertise on this site