Messages in this thread | | | From | KOSAKI Motohiro <> | Subject | Re: [PATCH 6/8] Add __GFP_OTHER_NODE flag | Date | Tue, 8 Mar 2011 09:19:06 +0900 (JST) |
| |
> > Yes, less intrusive. But are you using current NUMA stastics on > > practical system? > > Yes I do. I know users use it too. > > We unfortunately still have enough NUMA locality problems in the kernel > so that overflowing nodes, causing fallbacks for process memory etc. are not uncommon. > If you get that then numastat is very useful to track down what happens. > > In an ideal world with perfect NUMA balancing it wouldn't be needed, > but we're far from that. > > Also the numactl test suite depends on them.
If so, I have no objection of cource. :)
Thanks.
| |