lkml.org 
[lkml]   [2011]   [Mar]   [5]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
 
Messages in this thread
/
Date
From
SubjectRe: [PATCH v4 3/4] exec: unify do_execve/compat_do_execve code
On 03/05, Linus Torvalds wrote:
>
> Ok, everything looks fine to me.
>
> Except looking at this, I don't think this part:
>
> On Sat, Mar 5, 2011 at 12:31 PM, Oleg Nesterov <oleg@redhat.com> wrote:
> >
> >  struct user_arg_ptr {
> > -       const char __user *const __user *native;
> > +#ifdef CONFIG_COMPAT
> > +       bool is_compat;
> > +#endif
> > +       union {
> > +               const char __user *const __user *native;
> > +               compat_uptr_t __user *compat;
> > +       } ptr;
> >  };
>
> will necessarily even compile on an architecture that doesn't have any
> 'compat' support.

Aaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaah, now this is a really good point.

> Do we even define 'compat_uptr_t' for that case? I don't think so.

Indeed, you are right.

What I was thinking about? I do not know.

> So I suspect you need two of those annoying #ifdef's.

please expect v5 tomorrow.

Oleg.

--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/

\
 
 \ /
  Last update: 2011-03-06 11:19    [W:0.428 / U:0.064 seconds]
©2003-2020 Jasper Spaans|hosted at Digital Ocean and TransIP|Read the blog|Advertise on this site