[lkml]   [2011]   [Mar]   [4]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
Messages in this thread
    SubjectRe: [PATCH] perf lock: clean the options for perf record
    On Fri, Mar 04, 2011 at 09:37:18AM -0500, Steven Rostedt wrote:
    > On Fri, 2011-03-04 at 18:41 +0900, Hitoshi Mitake wrote:
    > > BTW, how do you think about the idea of exporting data in
    > > python (or other neutral) expression from procfs? I feel it is a
    > > good idea. Communicating with unified format between user space and
    > > kernel space will reduce lots of parsing overhead. Is this too
    > > aggressive or insane?
    > As I mentioned in another email, I have no problem with an easy to parse
    > file. But I will aggressively NAK any "python" or other scripting
    > language. I'm sure I would get the same response if I were to have the
    > kernel outputting perl language ;)

    Same for me.

    But even before talking about that, I wonder if doing this is actually needed.

     \ /
      Last update: 2011-03-06 11:19    [W:0.029 / U:6.900 seconds]
    ©2003-2016 Jasper Spaans. hosted at Digital OceanAdvertise on this site