lkml.org 
[lkml]   [2011]   [Mar]   [4]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
 
Messages in this thread
    /
    Date
    SubjectRe: [PATCH] ARM: twd: Adjust localtimer frequency with cpufreq notifiers
    From
    On Fri, Mar 4, 2011 at 12:31 PM, Rob Herring <robherring2@gmail.com> wrote:
    > On 03/04/2011 02:11 PM, Colin Cross wrote:
    >>
    >> On Fri, Mar 4, 2011 at 2:27 AM, martin persson
    >> <martin.persson@stericsson.com>  wrote:
    >>>
    >>> We've seen no problems using this patch and have been grateful for it's
    >>> existence. So I'm happy to put:
    >>>
    >>> Tested-by: martin.persson@stericsson.com
    >>>
    >>> /Martin
    >>>
    >>> On 03/04/2011 11:17 AM, Linus Walleij wrote:
    >>>>
    >>>> 2010/11/18 Colin Cross<ccross@android.com>:
    >>>>
    >>>>> The clock to the ARM TWD local timer scales with the cpu
    >>>>> frequency. To allow the cpu frequency to change while
    >>>>> maintaining a constant TWD frequency, pick a lower target
    >>>>> frequency for the TWD and use the prescaler to divide down
    >>>>> to the closest lower frequency.
    >>>>
    >>>> We are using this with some custom hooks for the U8500.
    >>>>
    >>>> Tested-by: Linus Walleij<linus.walleij@linaro.org>
    >>>>
    >>>> Martin Persson can probably provide an additional Tested-by
    >>>> from ST-Ericsson if it helps.
    >>>>
    >>>> Colin are you merging this patch for 2.6.39 through
    >>>> Russells tracker or pull request? It's an important patch
    >>>> for us.
    >>>>
    >>>> Yours,
    >>>> Linus Walleij
    >>>
    >>
    >> I never got any responses, and it conflicts with Rob Herring's patch
    >> 6434/1, although that has not been applied.  Russell, do you want this
    >> in the patch tracker?
    >
    > Russell wanted to move over completely to using the clock api rather than
    > making clock api usage optional and this was dependent on his init_early
    > changes for Realview/Versatile. So I need to update the patches based on
    > that.
    >
    > I think a cleaner solution for this is platforms should define a clock for
    > the local timer and the notifier can just get the clock rate again. But
    > these clocks have to be implemented first on all platforms using local timer
    > to make it unconditional, and I don't have the clock tree knowledge of all
    > those platforms.
    >
    > Rob
    >

    Using a clock along with the cpufreq notifiers would simplify my patch
    some. Maybe we can use the traction this patch has among platforms
    that use the twd to get the necessary clocks added. Can you post a
    version of your patch that assumes the presence of a twd clock, and
    I'll work on getting the necessary clocks added and updating my patch
    on top of yours?
    --
    To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
    the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
    More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
    Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/

    \
     
     \ /
      Last update: 2011-03-06 11:19    [W:4.026 / U:44.396 seconds]
    ©2003-2020 Jasper Spaans|hosted at Digital Ocean and TransIP|Read the blog|Advertise on this site