[lkml]   [2011]   [Mar]   [3]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
Messages in this thread
SubjectRe: [RFC] st_nlink after rmdir() and rename()
On Thu, Mar 3, 2011 at 1:37 PM, OGAWA Hirofumi
<> wrote:
> And I can't only see is why you refuse to make consistent behavior (if
> you are saying it). It's why I said if it's _really easy_.

The thing is, it really isn't really easy. As mentioned, it's actually
impossible on NFS, and it's possibly impossible on other filesystems

So what I'm objecting to is "try to make something consistent that
CANNOT be consistent anyway", and calling it a bug.

I'm not saying there aren't real bugs there too (the actual races in
i_nlink handling are real bugs). But I _am_ saying that it's simply
not true that i_nlink must be zero if you do an "fstat()" after doing
an rmdir on an fd that you held open. Nobody can reasonably care, and
anybody who _does_ care is better off getting a nasty surprise early
rather than late.


 \ /
  Last update: 2011-03-03 22:55    [W:0.111 / U:4.876 seconds]
©2003-2018 Jasper Spaans|hosted at Digital Ocean and TransIP|Read the blog|Advertise on this site