[lkml]   [2011]   [Mar]   [29]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
Messages in this thread
SubjectRe: [RFC PATCH] perf report: add sort by file lines
Em Tue, Mar 29, 2011 at 07:08:53PM +0200, Peter Zijlstra escreveu:
> On Tue, 2011-03-29 at 19:06 +0200, Peter Zijlstra wrote:
> > On Tue, 2011-03-29 at 19:03 +0200, Peter Zijlstra wrote:
> > > > Is it an unwind of the call frame stack to find out what data member was
> > > > accessed?

> > > No need to unwind stacks, DWARF should have information on function
> > > local stack. It should be able to tell you the type of things like -8(%
> > > rbp).

> > That is, we don't even have a life stack to unwind, so we simply cannot
> > unwind at all, but the debug information should be able to tell you the
> > type of whatever would live at a certain stack position if we were to
> > have a stack.

> Furthermore, I've now completely exhausted my knowledge of debuginfo and
> hope Masami and Arnaldo will help with further details ;-)


I think the place to look is 'perf probe', look for the way one
variable is translated to an expression passed to the kprobe_tracer, I
think you'll need the reverse operation.

Look at tools/perf/util/probe-finder.c, function find_variable() and

Understanding how those functions use the dwarf_ prefixed routines from
libdw should be a good start.

- Arnaldo

 \ /
  Last update: 2011-03-29 19:49    [W:0.090 / U:0.632 seconds]
©2003-2018 Jasper Spaans|hosted at Digital Ocean and TransIP|Read the blog|Advertise on this site