lkml.org 
[lkml]   [2011]   [Mar]   [28]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
 
Messages in this thread
/
Date
From
SubjectRe: TPM chip prevents machine from suspending
On Mon, 28 Mar 2011 13:25:06 -0400
Stefan Berger <stefanb@linux.vnet.ibm.com> wrote:

> On 03/28/2011 10:08 AM, Jeff Layton wrote:
> > My wife's machine apparently has a TPM chip in it. Since I upgraded it
> > to Fedora 14, it fails to suspend consistently. On the first attempt to
> > suspend it, it works fine. Once it has woken back up however, it will
> > not suspend again. Here's the dmesg log from such an attempt:
> >
> > [ 202.460967] PM: Syncing filesystems ... done.
> > [ 202.464818] PM: Preparing system for mem sleep
> > [ 202.485968] Freezing user space processes ... (elapsed 0.01 seconds) done.
> > [ 202.497079] Freezing remaining freezable tasks ... (elapsed 0.01 seconds) done.
> > [ 202.508067] PM: Entering mem sleep
> > [ 202.508086] Suspending console(s) (use no_console_suspend to debug)
> > [ 202.508451] sd 3:0:0:0: [sdb] Synchronizing SCSI cache
> > [ 202.508562] sd 2:0:0:0: [sda] Synchronizing SCSI cache
> > [ 202.508616] sd 3:0:0:0: [sdb] Stopping disk
> > [ 202.511956] parport_pc 00:0b: disabled
> > [ 202.512127] serial 00:09: disabled
> > [ 202.512134] serial 00:09: wake-up capability disabled by ACPI
> > [ 202.536058] legacy_suspend(): pnp_bus_suspend+0x0/0x82 returns 38
> > [ 202.536061] PM: Device 00:02 failed to suspend: error 38
> > [ 202.997517] sd 2:0:0:0: [sda] Stopping disk
> > [ 202.997806] PM: Some devices failed to suspend
> > [ 202.998085] sd 2:0:0:0: [sda] Starting disk
> > [ 202.998144] sd 3:0:0:0: [sdb] Starting disk
> > [ 202.998614] serial 00:09: activated
> > [ 202.999158] parport_pc 00:0b: activated
> > [ 204.543094] PM: resume of devices complete after 1545.282 msecs
> > [ 204.543268] PM: Finishing wakeup.
> > [ 204.543270] Restarting tasks ... done.
> >
> > ...error 38 is ENOSYS, and the 00:02 is this:
> >
> > # cat /sys/bus/pnp/devices/00\:02/id
> > IFX0102
> > PNP0c31
> Also the tpm_tis driver handles both of these. Can you confirm which
> module that laptop was using (tpm_tis or tpm_infineon) and try whether
> one of them works better than the other one? Please do a reboot between
> trying one and then the other.
>

It's using tpm_tis:

lrwxrwxrwx. 1 root root 0 Mar 28 13:40 /sys/bus/pnp/devices/00:02/driver -> ../../../bus/pnp/drivers/tpm_tis

FWIW, the fedora kernels have this:

CONFIG_TCG_TPM=y
CONFIG_TCG_TIS=y
CONFIG_TCG_NSC=m
CONFIG_TCG_ATMEL=m
CONFIG_TCG_INFINEON=m

When I boot, tpm_infineon is also plugged in, but I can remove that
module and nothing seems to change (not sure what's plugging it in).

I can try using tpm_infineon, but I'm not sure how to disable tpm_tis
with it compiled in like this -- is that possible?

> Try the following before and after a suspend/resume:
>
> cd /sys
> find . | grep caps$ | xargs cat
>
> It should display manufacturer data.
>

There's only one "caps" file. Here's the before (after a fresh reboot):

# cat ./devices/pnp0/00:02/caps
Manufacturer: 0x49465800
TCG version: 1.2
Firmware version: 1.0

...after a successful suspend/resume cycle:

# cat ./devices/pnp0/00:02/caps

...it gives no output at all. Guess that lends some weight to the
theory of it not being reset properly on resume?

Thanks for the help so far...
--
Jeff Layton <jlayton@poochiereds.net>


\
 
 \ /
  Last update: 2011-03-28 20:15    [W:0.059 / U:6.376 seconds]
©2003-2018 Jasper Spaans|hosted at Digital Ocean and TransIP|Read the blog|Advertise on this site