lkml.org 
[lkml]   [2011]   [Mar]   [28]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
 
Messages in this thread
/
SubjectRe: [PATCH] ata: pata_at91.c bugfix for initial_timing initialisation
From
Date
Dear Sergei and Eric,

It's so stupid from my side to send broken patch, but it happens :-)

Please, look at new my e-mails with subjects:
* "[PATCH v4 1/2] ata: pata_at91.c bugfix for initial_timing
initialisation"
* "[PATCH v4 2/2] ata: pata_at91.c bugfix for high master clock"

Best regards!
--
Igor Plyatov

> Hello.
>
> Igor Plyatov wrote:
>
> > The "struct ata_timing" must contain 10 members, but ".dmack_hold" member was
> > forgotten for "initial_timing" initialisation. This patch fixes such a problem.
>
> > Signed-off-by: Igor Plyatov <plyatov@gmail.com>
> > ---
> > drivers/ata/pata_at91.c | 5 +++--
> > 1 files changed, 3 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
>
> > diff --git a/drivers/ata/pata_at91.c b/drivers/ata/pata_at91.c
> > index 0da0dcc..d1aaeb5 100644
> > --- a/drivers/ata/pata_at91.c
> > +++ b/drivers/ata/pata_at91.c
> > @@ -49,8 +49,9 @@ struct at91_ide_info {
> > void __iomem *alt_addr;
> > };
> >
> > -static const struct ata_timing initial_timing =
> > - {XFER_PIO_0, 70, 290, 240, 600, 165, 150, 600, 0};
> > +static const struct ata_timing initial_timing = {
> > + XFER_PIO_0, 70, 290, 240, 600, 165, 150, 600, 0
> > +};
>
> Frankly, I don't see any difference.
>
> WBR, Sergei




\
 
 \ /
  Last update: 2011-03-28 15:03    [from the cache]
©2003-2011 Jasper Spaans