Messages in this thread | | | Date | Fri, 25 Mar 2011 16:05:51 +0200 | Subject | Re: [PATCH] kmemleak: build kmemleak-test.c as a module-only | From | Daniel Baluta <> |
| |
On Wed, Mar 23, 2011 at 1:24 PM, Catalin Marinas <catalin.marinas@arm.com> wrote: > On Wed, 2011-03-16 at 18:16 +0000, Daniel Baluta wrote: >> mm/kmemleak-test.c is used to provide an example of how kmemleak >> tool works. >> >> Memory is leaked at module unload-time, so building the test >> in kernel (Y) makes the leaks impossible and the test useless. >> >> Qualify DEBUG_KMEMLEAK_TEST config symbol with "depends on m", >> to restrict module-only building. >> >> Signed-off-by: Daniel Baluta <dbaluta@ixiacom.com> > > Sorry for the delay. > > Acked-by: Catalin Marinas <catalin.marinas@arm.com>
Who should pick this up?
$ scripts/get_maintainer.pl lib/this.patch says: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org> (commit_signer:8/56=14%) "Paul E. McKenney" <paulmck@linux.vnet.ibm.com> (commit_signer:7/56=12%) Ingo Molnar <mingo@elte.hu> (commit_signer:5/56=9%) Frederic Weisbecker <fweisbec@gmail.com> (commit_signer:5/56=9%) Randy Dunlap <rdunlap@xenotime.net> (commit_signer:3/56=5%)
Am I missing something?
thanks, Daniel.
| |