Messages in this thread | | | Date | Thu, 24 Mar 2011 23:57:52 -0300 | From | Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo <> | Subject | Re: [PATCH v2 -tip] perf probe: Add fastpath to do lookup by function name |
| |
Em Fri, Mar 25, 2011 at 10:14:25AM +0900, Masami Hiramatsu escreveu: > (2011/03/24 23:09), Lin Ming wrote: > > v2 -> v1: > > - Don't compare file names with cu_find_realpath(...), instead, compare them > > with the name returned by dwarf_decl_file(sp_die) > > > > The vmlinux file may have thousands of CUs. > > We can lookup function name from .debug_pubnames section > > to avoid the slow loop on CUs. > > > > ./perf stat -r 10 -- ./perf probe -k /home/mlin/vmlinux \ > > -s /home/mlin/linux-2.6 \ > > --line csum_partial_copy_to_user > tmp.log > > > > before patch applied > > ===================== > > 364.535892 task-clock-msecs # 0.997 CPUs > > 0 context-switches # 0.000 M/sec > > 0 CPU-migrations # 0.000 M/sec > > 29,993 page-faults # 0.082 M/sec > > 865,862,109 cycles # 2375.245 M/sec > > 1,255,259,630 instructions # 1.450 IPC > > 252,400,884 branches # 692.390 M/sec > > 3,429,376 branch-misses # 1.359 % > > 1,386,990 cache-references # 3.805 M/sec > > 687,188 cache-misses # 1.885 M/sec > > > > 0.365792170 seconds time elapsed > > > > after patch applied > > ===================== > > 89.896405 task-clock-msecs # 0.991 CPUs > > 1 context-switches # 0.000 M/sec > > 0 CPU-migrations # 0.000 M/sec > > 10,145 page-faults # 0.113 M/sec > > 214,553,875 cycles # 2386.679 M/sec > > 226,915,559 instructions # 1.058 IPC > > 44,536,614 branches # 495.422 M/sec > > 613,074 branch-misses # 1.377 % > > 860,787 cache-references # 9.575 M/sec > > 442,380 cache-misses # 4.921 M/sec > > > > 0.090716032 seconds time elapsed > > Thanks! Looks very good :) > > Acked-by: Masami Hiramatsu <masami.hiramatsu.pt@hitachi.com>
Indeed, I'll try and process this one tomorrow,
Thanks a lot!
- Arnaldo
| |