Messages in this thread | | | Date | Wed, 23 Mar 2011 12:59:58 -0700 | From | Randy Dunlap <> | Subject | Re: [RFC] usbnet: use eth%d name for known ethernet devices |
| |
On Wed, 23 Mar 2011 20:57:18 +0100 Arnd Bergmann wrote:
> On Wednesday 23 March 2011 20:53:13 Michał Nazarewicz wrote: > > On Mar 23, 2011 8:36 PM, "Arnd Bergmann" <arnd@arndb.de> wrote: > > > > > > On Wednesday 23 March 2011 19:46:50 Greg KH wrote: > > > > > @@ -97,6 +97,8 @@ struct driver_info { > > > > > > > > > > #define FLAG_LINK_INTR 0x0800 /* updates link (carrier) status */ > > > > > > > > > > +#define FLAG_PTP 0x1000 /* maybe use "usb%d" names */ > > > > > > > > "PTP"? What does that stand for? > > > > > > point-to-point, I'll improve the comment to spell it out when I send the > > > fixed version. > > > > I think P2P could be better. > > Yes, good idea.
that's peer-to-peer.
OTOH, I knew that PTP was point-to-point.
--- ~Randy *** Remember to use Documentation/SubmitChecklist when testing your code *** -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
| |