lkml.org 
[lkml]   [2011]   [Mar]   [23]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
 
Messages in this thread
/
Date
From
SubjectRe: [RFC] usbnet: use eth%d name for known ethernet devices
On Wed, 23 Mar 2011 20:57:18 +0100 Arnd Bergmann wrote:

> On Wednesday 23 March 2011 20:53:13 Michał Nazarewicz wrote:
> > On Mar 23, 2011 8:36 PM, "Arnd Bergmann" <arnd@arndb.de> wrote:
> > >
> > > On Wednesday 23 March 2011 19:46:50 Greg KH wrote:
> > > > > @@ -97,6 +97,8 @@ struct driver_info {
> > > > >
> > > > > #define FLAG_LINK_INTR 0x0800 /* updates link (carrier) status */
> > > > >
> > > > > +#define FLAG_PTP 0x1000 /* maybe use "usb%d" names */
> > > >
> > > > "PTP"? What does that stand for?
> > >
> > > point-to-point, I'll improve the comment to spell it out when I send the
> > > fixed version.
> >
> > I think P2P could be better.
>
> Yes, good idea.

that's peer-to-peer.

OTOH, I knew that PTP was point-to-point.

---
~Randy
*** Remember to use Documentation/SubmitChecklist when testing your code ***
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/

\
 
 \ /
  Last update: 2011-03-23 21:03    [W:0.158 / U:0.148 seconds]
©2003-2020 Jasper Spaans|hosted at Digital Ocean and TransIP|Read the blog|Advertise on this site