lkml.org 
[lkml]   [2011]   [Mar]   [22]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
 
Messages in this thread
/
From
SubjectRe: [PATCH 9/10] sh: Use struct syscore_ops instead of sysdev class and sysdev
Date
On Tuesday, March 22, 2011, Kay Sievers wrote:
> On Tue, 2011-03-22 at 23:23 +0100, Rafael J. Wysocki wrote:
> > On Tuesday, March 22, 2011, Kay Sievers wrote:
...
> >
> > Now, I can easily understand arguments about representing everything under
> > /sys/devices/ by struct device objects, no question about that. However,
> > I also think there should be a place for things like those mentioned in the
> > comment in sys.c, presumably outside of /sys/devices/.
>
> No, please. We have all we need. Let's do one example, which you might
> apply to any other thing, because you never know what's the next big
> thing in hardware. We need to be a future-proof-as-possible, and that's
> not some second-class out-of-scope sysfs directory.
>
> Lets' take CPUs:
> - they send events when registered
> - they want to export device specific properties
> - userspace wants to take actions when such devices are available
>
> That all fits properly into the driver model in theory. Unless you do
> coldplug and bootup a box.
>
> These devices are already there before userspace even starts, hence we
> find all these devices and "trigger" an fake uevent for all of them at
> bootup. That will match execute all the rules specified for that device,
> just as it would be hotplugges in that moment, hence we call it
> coldplug, which works for all devices with the hotplug code, even when
> they are never hot-pluggable.
>
> What we do for coldplug is that we iterate over all flat lists of
> subsystems and find the devices lists and trigger the event by poking in
> the "uevent" sysfs file. Now all the sysdevs do not have a subsystem to
> find, and do not have a standard "uevent" file.
>
> Back to the CPUs, we have all the nice device directories which could
> have all the CPU features in properties we need to make autoloading of
> cpufreq, governer, kvm possible (patch exists from Andi Kleen already)
>
> But these dumb CPU sysfs device directories are completely invisible for
> the *usual* logic, and should just join the model and all will just work
> out-of-the-box.

That all is cool, but I'm not sure how it is related to things like
available_clocksource and current_clocksource (which happen to be located
under /sys/devices/system/clocksource/clocksource0/ being simply a path
in sysfs).

> When we started to clean up /sys (again only talking about devices, not
> other stuff) we had:
> /block/*
> /class/<subsys>/*
> /bus/<subsys>/devices/*
> /devices/system/<subsys>/*
> which are 4 different exports of exactly the same thing, a "device".
> "Block" we converted to "class" already, "class" will be converted to
> "bus", and "bus" will be renamed to "subsystem". All the current names
> will be kept as compat symlinks, just as we did for "block". After that,
> _all_ devices have a "subsystem" and a subsystem global directory where
> people can add custom stuff shared by all devices-of-the-same-type. Ev

OK, sounds good.

> You can also argument from the other side, if a kernel device export is
> not worth the few bytes of /sys/devices/ and a "subsystem" (struct
> bus_type) it should not be in /sys at all, especially not hidden
> somehwere outside of /sys/devices when it is something remotely close to
> a device.

Well, Greg apparently thinks that available_clocksource and current_clocksource
could be located under /sys/bus/clock/. Perhaps other attributes now exported
through sysdevs could be moved to places like this?

Rafael


\
 
 \ /
  Last update: 2011-03-23 00:35    [from the cache]
©2003-2011 Jasper Spaans