Messages in this thread | | | From | OGAWA Hirofumi <> | Subject | Re: [PATCH 2/2 v2] Unify rest of FAT messages. | Date | Wed, 02 Mar 2011 23:17:02 +0900 |
| |
Alexey Fisher <bug-track@fisher-privat.net> writes:
> Hi, > > are there any updates on this issue?
Sorry for late reply. Honestly I'm not reviewing those yet. But I'll apply 1/4, 2/4, 3/4 probably.
Thanks.
> Am Donnerstag, den 11.11.2010, 05:53 +0900 schrieb OGAWA Hirofumi: >> Alexey Fisher <bug-track@fisher-privat.net> writes: >> >> >> Also, yes. It would be complicate more or less than one FS. And maybe I >> >> can understand why you want to concentrate FAT. >> >> >> >> But I'm afraid to implement for only FAT. If there is not any some sort >> >> of agreement by others, it may have to re-implement. If that happen, FAT >> >> can be bothered by compatible (or have to maintain both of old and new >> >> for a while). Because the notified data are some sort of ABI, IMO. >> >> >> >> This is why I'm careful about this, and can't say easily - "let's try it >> >> on FAT". >> > >> > I'm not sure if we talk about same thing now :D >> > By notification you mean the idea to notify userspace about error? >> > correct? >> >> Sure. I was talking about "to notify userspace". :) >> >> > In my previous email i switched the point, it will be to complicate for >> > now to work on notification system. For now i'll be happy to see grep >> > friendly logs. Same like ext2,3,4 do >> > >> > http://git.kernel.org/?p=linux/kernel/git/torvalds/linux-2.6.git;a=commit;h=4cf46b67eb6de94532c1bea11d2479d085229d0e >> > >> > In long term it will be good to have such notification system. So i will >> > start new tread about it. >> >> OK, I see. I'll review patches. Looks good though. >> >> Thanks. > >
-- OGAWA Hirofumi <hirofumi@mail.parknet.co.jp>
| |