lkml.org 
[lkml]   [2011]   [Mar]   [2]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
 
Messages in this thread
/
Subjecta major regression in recent kernels? - was: Re: Null pointer OOPS in sync_inodes_sb+0xa9/0x104
From
Date
Hi Linus,

I am not sure who the "responsible" person for this is but a problem is emerging on recent kernels where device hot plug and/or suspend/resume (which I guess effectively performas hot plug/unplug as part of its operation) causes kernel crashes with NULL pointer dereference. It has now been reported at least by three different people on LKML/fs-devel and also one of Tuxera's customers is seeing it too on their embedded hardware.

The problem appears to be that on device unplug, the s_bdi field in the struct super block is set to NULL. But at that point a file system is still mounted and fully operational! So any file system / VFS code that goes through s_bdi causes a NULL pointer dereference.

Not sure what the correct solution is but this is definitely a functional regression given I now am aware of four independent reports in recent kernels but never before.

Here are links to the reports in the archives:

https://lkml.org/lkml/2010/12/9/436

http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/linux/kernel/1345992

And below is the third report which appears to be the same problem as the above two, i.e. the super block's s_bdi is NULL, so dereferencing it causes a NULL pointer dereference and sync_inodes_sb() contains a call to bdi_queue_work() which is likely inlined automatically by gcc and the crash is thus when bdi is first dereferenced in bdi_queue_work()...

Not sure what the solution is. I don't think it is a matter of checking against s_bdi being NULL because it is used in a lot of places so it will be hard to track them all down. More likely s_bdi should not be set to NULL until all super_block structures referencing it go away and the disappeared device driver code should be adapted to match but I may be wrong...

Just thought you should be made aware as this problem appears to be ignored / stay under the radar of people who actually have a hope of fixing it properly so far...

Best regards,

Anton

On 2 Mar 2011, at 03:44, George Spelvin wrote:
> Just after resuming from a suspend to RAM, 2.6.38-rc6 plus Eric Dumazet's
> [PATCH] net: Add default_advmss() methods to blackhole dst_ops
>
> Core 2 duo, 32-bit kernel, 2 GiB RAM.
> I suspend to RAM every few days; this is not the first
> time since booting.
>
> The display hadn'd flipped to X yet, so I managed to capture the screen
> (manually transcribed):
>
> BUG: unable to handle kernel NULL pointer dereference at 00000030
> IP: [<c10a3a21>] sync_inodes_sb+0xa9/0x104
> *pde = 00000000
> Oops: 0000 [#1] SMP
> last sysfs file: /sys/devices/pci0000:00/0000:00:1d.1/usb3/3-1/3-1.3/3-1.3:1.0/input11/name
> Modules linked in: btusb sco rfcomm l2cap crc16 bluetooth ctr twofish_generic twofish_i586 twofish_common serpent xcbc sha256_generic b43 mac80211 cfg80211
>
> Pid: 23367, comm: mount Not tainted 2.6.38-rc6 #228 Dell Inc. MXC061 /0MG532
> EIP: 0060:[<c10a3a21>] EFLAGS: 0010246 CPU: 1
> EIP is at sync_inodes_sb+0xa9/0x104
> EAX: c003fd5c EBX: f58f606c ECX: 00000000 EDX: 00000909
> ESI: d4cc1424 EDI: c003fd0c EBP: 00000000 ESP: f56ffee8
> DS: 007b ES: 007b FS: 00d8 GS: 0033 SS: 0068
> Process mount (pid: 23367, ti=f56fe000 task=c28472a0 task.ti = f56fe000)
> Stack:
> 7fffffff f58f6000 00000001 00000000 f56ffef8 f56ffef8 f56fff04 00000000
> 00000303 f56fff0c f56fff0c f58f6000 00000001 00000000 f4a57000 c10a6c72
> f58f6000 00000020 00000000 c108e442 00000000 00000000 00000020 00000000
> Call Trace:
> [<c10a6c72>] ? _sync_filesystem+0x3a/0x69
> [<c108e442>] ? do_remount_sb+0x59/0xce
> [<c10a067b>] ? do_mount+0x214/0x6a8
> [<c10a0b83>] ? sys_mount+0x74/0xa9
> [<c1002750>] ? sysenter_do_call+0x12/0x26
> Code: b9 3a c1 e8 f4 6d f8 ff b8 80 f7 51 c1 31 f6 e8 f1 09 26 00 8b 7b 6c 83 c3 6c 83 ef 50 eb 44 f6 47 30 38 75 38 8b af c0 00 00 00 <83> 7d 30 00 74 2c 89 f8 e8 1a 85 ff ff fe 05 80 f7 51 c1 89 f0
> EIP: [<c10a3a21>] sync_inodes_sb+0xa9/0x104 SS:ESP 0068:f56ffee8
> CR2: 0000000000000030
>
> I can't make much sense out of it, but maybe someone can. It's a simple
> laptop with one rotating hard drive. Distro is Debian/unstable, kernel
> is hand-compiled from Linus' git.

--
Anton Altaparmakov <aia21 at cam.ac.uk> (replace at with @)
Unix Support, Computing Service, University of Cambridge, CB2 3QH, UK
Linux NTFS maintainer, http://www.linux-ntfs.org/



\
 
 \ /
  Last update: 2011-03-02 12:15    [W:0.072 / U:43.648 seconds]
©2003-2018 Jasper Spaans|hosted at Digital Ocean and TransIP|Read the blog|Advertise on this site