[lkml]   [2011]   [Mar]   [19]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
Messages in this thread
SubjectRe: [000/474] review

2011/3/18 Thomas Gleixner <>:
> On Thu, 17 Mar 2011, Greg KH wrote:
>> Yeah, I know what you are thinking, "What, 2.6.33, are you crazy?"
> Aren't we all crazy ?
>> I'd prefer it if you didn't answer that question...
> Too late. You should have put this before the question.
>> So, if you are using .33, please give this patch a test and let me know
>> if I've messed up anything (hint, I think I did, it's up to you to
>> figure it out, consider it a test to see if anyone actually cares about
>> this kernel version.)
> We'll pull it into rt and figure out what breaks.

Can you please elaborate somewhat on the status of the RT-patchset
development for 2.6.38 and on?
It is silent about it for quite a while now, and actually the gap
between mainstream and the latest RT has never been this big before...
Are there major complications, lack on time or hands? Can I help ?

Thanks for the all the effort,

Kind regards,


 \ /
  Last update: 2011-03-19 15:49    [W:0.057 / U:1.696 seconds]
©2003-2020 Jasper Spaans|hosted at Digital Ocean and TransIP|Read the blog|Advertise on this site