[lkml]   [2011]   [Mar]   [18]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
Messages in this thread
SubjectRe: [000/474] review
On Thu, Mar 17, 2011 at 10:38 PM, Greg KH <> wrote:
> Yeah, I know what you are thinking, "What, 2.6.33, are you crazy?"
> I'd prefer it if you didn't answer that question...
> Anyway, yes, a .33 kernel release, strange isn't it.
> Turns out there are a lot of people "stuck" on the 2.6.33 kernel series
> for a variety of valid reasons, not the least being the Real Time
> patchset.  So, in the copious spare time I have, I've been trying to
> keep up with the patches that have been applied to the different
> longterm and stable kernel trees and have been queueing them up for .33
> as well.
> Here's the result of that.  A 474 patch series that is bigger than most
> people ever want to review, or see in their inboxes.  Because of that,
> it is ONLY being sent to the mailing list.  If
> you want to see the individual patches, look at the git tree of the
> patch queue, or look at that mailing list.
> So, if you are using .33, please give this patch a test and let me know
> if I've messed up anything (hint, I think I did, it's up to you to
> figure it out, consider it a test to see if anyone actually cares about
> this kernel version.)
> If I missed anything that I should have in here, please let me know.
> Responses should be made by Saturday, March 19, 2011, 21:00:00 UTC.
> Anything received after that time might be too late.
> The whole patch series can be found in one patch at:
> and the diffstat can be found below.

There is no rc1, so I assume
is correct?
Which git tree do I want to use?

John Kacur
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to
More majordomo info at
Please read the FAQ at

 \ /
  Last update: 2011-03-18 10:25    [W:0.077 / U:0.604 seconds]
©2003-2020 Jasper Spaans|hosted at Digital Ocean and TransIP|Read the blog|Advertise on this site