lkml.org 
[lkml]   [2011]   [Mar]   [18]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
 
Messages in this thread
/
From
Date
SubjectRe: [PATCH v2] arm: cmpxchg syscall should data abort if page not write
Dear Nicolas Pitre,

On Fri, Mar 18, 2011 at 1:57 AM, Nicolas Pitre <nicolas.pitre@linaro.org> wrote:
> On Thu, 17 Mar 2011, Ashwin Chaugule wrote:
>>
>> Just beginning to understand the subtleties involved, so please
>> correct me if I'm wrong.
>> Wont this patch also fix the problem that was brought up with futexes
>> on ARM SMP ?
>
> Nope.  The code being fixed here was suptly broken so it needs fixing.
> However this code is almost never used, if at all, as it is a fall-back
> solution for when all the better alternatives are not available for some
> reasons (and I'm still wondering what those reasons are for Po-Yu Chuang
> to actually use that code).  In practice this bug should have affected
> no one.

We met this problem while porting an v5 SMP processor because kernel
selects NEEDS_SYSCALL_FOR_CMPXCHG by default if CPU_32v5.

After we added our own implementation of __kuser_cmpxchg, this code
is not needed anymore. But since this is actually a bug, it is still a good
idea to submit a patch. :-)

> If you have SMP then this code is definitively not what you should be
> using.

Best regards,
Po-Yu Chuang
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/

\
 
 \ /
  Last update: 2011-03-18 09:47    [W:0.036 / U:5.568 seconds]
©2003-2020 Jasper Spaans|hosted at Digital Ocean and TransIP|Read the blog|Advertise on this site