[lkml]   [2011]   [Mar]   [18]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
Messages in this thread
    SubjectRe: IIO comments
    On 03/18/11 16:57, Arnd Bergmann wrote:
    > On Friday 18 March 2011, Jonathan Cameron wrote:
    >>> I guess if it's always in${i}-in${i+1}, it's still not too hard.
    >> I think they have been so far, but doubt this is universal.
    >> How about having a diff type and just having a pair of indices in the
    >> channel structure? Actually may need a third for x^2+y^2+z^2 devices.
    >> (iirc there are parts that do x^2+y^2 despite also having a z channel)
    >> ...
    > If two identifiers are common, that would probably be fine.
    > If you have a x^2+y^2+z^2 device, it might be easier to call that
    > a different type with a fixed name, as long as there is a small
    > number of combinations.
    True. A balance to be struck there as and when they occur.



     \ /
      Last update: 2011-03-18 18:53    [W:0.020 / U:1.436 seconds]
    ©2003-2017 Jasper Spaans. hosted at Digital OceanAdvertise on this site