lkml.org 
[lkml]   [2011]   [Mar]   [18]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
 
Messages in this thread
/
From
SubjectRe: IIO comments
Date
On Friday 18 March 2011, Jonathan Cameron wrote:
> > I guess if it's always in${i}-in${i+1}, it's still not too hard.
> I think they have been so far, but doubt this is universal.
> How about having a diff type and just having a pair of indices in the
> channel structure? Actually may need a third for x^2+y^2+z^2 devices.
> (iirc there are parts that do x^2+y^2 despite also having a z channel)
> ...

If two identifiers are common, that would probably be fine.

If you have a x^2+y^2+z^2 device, it might be easier to call that
a different type with a fixed name, as long as there is a small
number of combinations.

Arnd


\
 
 \ /
  Last update: 2011-03-18 18:01    [W:0.033 / U:0.812 seconds]
©2003-2020 Jasper Spaans|hosted at Digital Ocean and TransIP|Read the blog|Advertise on this site