[lkml]   [2011]   [Mar]   [18]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
Messages in this thread
SubjectRe: [PATCH] Allow LAPB users know which data were actually sent.
> > Looks sensible but your patch doesn't add a user for it so what is it
> > needed for ?
> I implement accessor for special equipment (acessing fiscal information)
> which uses custom protocol over LAPB. As it is being implemented,
> I actually wanted to know if this approach for using LAPB is good enough
> for mainline submission, as I want to have kernel part to be in mainline.
> I think I will have the rest of patches ready within two weeks.

It seems sensible as an implementation to me so I would carry on using
that model and then submit it with all the other bits when you are ready.

 \ /
  Last update: 2011-03-18 12:37    [W:0.035 / U:3.400 seconds]
©2003-2020 Jasper Spaans|hosted at Digital Ocean and TransIP|Read the blog|Advertise on this site