lkml.org 
[lkml]   [2011]   [Mar]   [16]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
 
Messages in this thread
/
SubjectRe: musb as module broken in 2.6.38
From
Date
hi,

On Mar 16, 2011, at 12:30 PM, Alexander Holler wrote:
> Am 16.03.2011 11:24, schrieb Felipe Balbi:
>> Hi,
>>
>> On Mar 16, 2011, at 12:17 PM, Alexander Holler wrote:
>>>> static int __init omap2430_probe(struct platform_device *pdev)
>>>
>>> Neither omap2430_init() nor omap2430_probe() will be called here.
>>
>> and why is that ? It's even in sysfs already:
>>
>>>>> beagle linux # ls /sys/devices/platform/ | grep musb
>>>>> musb-omap2430
>
> Don't know, I haven't written or changed the driver. ;)

hehe, Just thought that you had something in mind already.

probe() functions are called when, in case of platform_devices,
the name matches with driver name. musb-omap2430 platform_device
is allocated in arch/arm/mach-omap2/usb-musb.c, then musb-2430
driver lives in drivers/usb/musb/omap2430.c. musb-2430 allocates a
platform_device for musb-hdrc core driver.

We did that because the same core is used in many different platforms
(OMAP, discrete chips, ST-Ericsson, DaVinci, PCI cards, etc) so we
needed to "abstract" platform-specific details such as clock handling
and power management.

There's still work to be done, for sure, e.g. the DMA part is still quite
screwed up, but the drivers are correctly named which means they
should be matching and probing. Now, musb-hdrc isn't probing, as
you say, and I'd like to know why. I'll try to spend some time in
it when I get back to the office.

--
balbi



\
 
 \ /
  Last update: 2011-03-16 11:41    [W:0.042 / U:0.572 seconds]
©2003-2020 Jasper Spaans|hosted at Digital Ocean and TransIP|Read the blog|Advertise on this site