lkml.org 
[lkml]   [2011]   [Mar]   [16]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
 
Messages in this thread
/
SubjectRe: [RFC PATCH 0/4] perf: Custom contexts
From
Date
On Wed, 2011-03-16 at 14:53 +0100, Frederic Weisbecker wrote:
> On Tue, Mar 15, 2011 at 11:32:54PM +0100, Peter Zijlstra wrote:
> > Right, so I don't much like the interface, two new ioctl()s and a flag
> > of dubious use.
>
> Do you think we need a new syscall for this new feature.

No.

> > How important is this recursive nature of the thing to you:
> >
> > > It's supposed to support infinite combinations with starter having starters
> > > themselves, plus filters, etc...
> >
> > We've so far avoided recursion like that, we only have single level
> > groups etc.
>
> There is actually no recursivity of any sort that the kernel has to handle.
> The starter/stopper links are never handled recursively. ie: there is no
> loop walking through the entire chain of starter to starter to starter, etc...
>
> It's always only handled between direct related event: starter and target, but
> never further.
>
> Only the final effect has recursion properties in the resulting count
> or trace.

That's not an answer to my question.


\
 
 \ /
  Last update: 2011-03-16 14:59    [W:0.043 / U:1.904 seconds]
©2003-2020 Jasper Spaans|hosted at Digital Ocean and TransIP|Read the blog|Advertise on this site