Messages in this thread | | | Date | Mon, 14 Mar 2011 02:59:00 +0100 (CET) | Subject | Re: [PATCH v3] introduce sys_syncfs to sync a single file system | From | "Indan Zupancic" <> |
| |
On Mon, March 14, 2011 02:45, Jeff Garzik wrote: > On 03/13/2011 09:31 PM, Indan Zupancic wrote: >> The new syscall works on only one fd too. The behaviour of the proposed >> syncfs and an extended sync_file_range is exactly the same. > > No, it's not. You should read the patch before commenting.
Have you read my sync_file_range patch? Because it's exactly the same code, but put in sync_file_range instead of a new system call. How that can have different behaviour, I have no idea.
| |