lkml.org 
[lkml]   [2011]   [Mar]   [10]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
 
Messages in this thread
Patch in this message
/
Date
From
Subject[PATCH 2/3] trace-cmd: correct cpu list parsing
Old parsing code is incorrect, when we use execute
./trace-cmd report --cpu 1,2-4,6,9-13

the result of filter_cpus will be:
1,2,1,2,3,4,6,9,5,6,7,8,9,10,11,12,13

The correct filter_cpus should be:
1,2,3,4,6,9,10,11,12,13,

I can change about 10 existed lines to make it correct, but it will be
still bad readability, so I port the neat and good readability code:
linux_kernel_src/lib/bitmap.c:bitmap_parselist()
to here and replace the origin code

Signed-off-by: Lai Jiangshan <laijs@cn.fujitsu.com>
---
trace-read.c | 76 ++++++++++++++-------------------------------------------
1 files changed, 19 insertions(+), 57 deletions(-)

diff --git a/trace-read.c b/trace-read.c
index 1cd9bd3..932f5aa 100644
--- a/trace-read.c
+++ b/trace-read.c
@@ -738,9 +738,8 @@ static void sig_end(int sig)
exit(0);
}

-static const char *inc_and_test_char(const char *p, const char *cpu_str)
+static const char *skip_space_and_test_digit(const char *p, const char *cpu_str)
{
- p++;
while (isspace(*p))
p++;
if (!isdigit(*p))
@@ -754,64 +753,27 @@ static void __add_cpu(int cpu)
filter_cpus = tracecmd_add_id(filter_cpus, cpu, nr_filter_cpus++);
}

-static int process_cpu_str(const char *cpu_str)
+static void parse_cpulist(const char *cpu_str)
{
- const char *p = cpu_str;
- int cpu, ncpu, ret_cpu = 1;
+ unsigned a, b;
+ const char *s = cpu_str;

do {
- while (isspace(*p))
- p++;
-
- cpu = atoi(p);
- __add_cpu(cpu);
-
- again:
- while (isdigit(*p))
- p++;
- while (isspace(*p))
- p++;
-
- if (*p) {
- ret_cpu = 0;
- switch (*p) {
- case '-':
- p = inc_and_test_char(p, cpu_str);
- ncpu = atoi(p);
- if (ncpu < cpu)
- die("range of cpu numbers must be lower to greater");
- for (; cpu <= ncpu; cpu++)
- __add_cpu(cpu);
- break;
-
- case ',':
- case ':':
- p = inc_and_test_char(p, cpu_str);
- ncpu = atoi(p);
- __add_cpu(ncpu);
- break;
- default:
- die("invalid character '%c' in cpu string '%s'",
- *p, cpu_str);
- }
- goto again;
+ s = skip_space_and_test_digit(s, cpu_str);
+ b = a = strtoul(s, (char **)&s, 10);
+ if (*s == '-') {
+ s = skip_space_and_test_digit(s + 1, cpu_str);
+ b = strtoul(s, (char **)&s, 10);
}
- } while (*p);
-
- if (ret_cpu)
- return cpu;
-
- /* Return -1 if we added more than one CPU */
- return -1;
-}
-
-static void add_cpu(const char *cpu_str)
-{
- int cpu;
-
- cpu = process_cpu_str(cpu_str);
- if (cpu >= 0)
- __add_cpu(cpu);
+ if (!(a <= b))
+ die("range of cpu numbers must be lower to greater");
+ while (a <= b) {
+ __add_cpu(a);
+ a++;
+ }
+ if (*s == ',' || *s == ':')
+ s++;
+ } while (*s != '\0');
}

static void read_file_fd(int fd, char *dst, int len)
@@ -958,7 +920,7 @@ void trace_report (int argc, char **argv)
case 0:
switch(option_index) {
case 0: /* cpu */
- add_cpu(optarg);
+ parse_cpulist(optarg);
break;
case 1: /* events */
print_events = 1;
--
1.7.4

\
 
 \ /
  Last update: 2011-03-10 10:59    [W:0.044 / U:0.248 seconds]
©2003-2020 Jasper Spaans|hosted at Digital Ocean and TransIP|Read the blog|Advertise on this site