lkml.org 
[lkml]   [2011]   [Feb]   [7]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
 
Messages in this thread
/
Date
From
SubjectRe: Commit 500f7147cf5bafd139056d521536b10c2bc2e154 breaks _resume_
Takashi,

is this potentially breaking S3 resume with nouveau cards, too?

Regards,
Marc

* Takashi Iwai <tiwai@suse.de> [2011-02-07 09:25:42 +0100]:

> At Mon, 7 Feb 2011 13:02:46 +0800,
> Jeff Chua wrote:
> >
> > On Mon, Feb 7, 2011 at 12:48 PM, Jeff Chua <jeff.chua.linux@gmail.com> wrote:
> > > On Sun, Feb 6, 2011 at 11:27 PM, Chris Wilson <chris@chris-wilson.co.uk> wrote:
> > >> One last step: move contents of intel_crtc_reset() back to
> > >> intel_crtc_init() one by one.
> > >>
> > >> The active flag is my suspicion. I was thinking that we brought up the
> > >> outputs in a similar manner upon resume as upon initial boot. On
> > >> reflection, this is the not case.
> > >>
> > >> However, the first action we take inside modesetting is to disable the
> > >> outputs about to be reconfigured. So setting active should be the right
> > >> course of action so that cleanup any residual state from resume.
> > >>
> > >> So I am intrigued as to which line is the cause, and just where the
> > >> machine becomes unresponsive...
> > >
> > > It's this line causing the problem.
> > >
> > > intel_crtc->active = true; /* force the pipe off on setup_init_config */
> > >
> > >
> > > When it's called before entering intel_crtc_reset(&intel_crtc->base),
> > > it works, but if called within the function, it doesn't work. Strange.
> > > Not sure whether is passing the correct value to to_intel_crtc(crtc)?
> >
> > I've added printk() below and the function returns a different value
> > of intel_crtc.
> >
> >
> > static void intel_crtc_reset(struct drm_crtc *crtc)
> > {
> > struct intel_crtc *intel_crtc = to_intel_crtc(crtc);
> > printk("intel_crtc %p\n", intel_crtc); ===> intel_crtc ffff8802349d1000
> >
> > }
> >
> > printk("intel_crtc %p\n", intel_crtc); ===> intel_crtc ffff8802349d0000
> > intel_crtc_reset(&intel_crtc->base);
>
> That's weird. Since base is the first member, both intel_crtc and crtc
> must be identical.
>
>
> Takashi
> --
> To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
> the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
> More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
> Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
>
>

--
Marc Koschewski


\
 
 \ /
  Last update: 2011-02-07 11:05    [W:0.064 / U:0.072 seconds]
©2003-2020 Jasper Spaans|hosted at Digital Ocean and TransIP|Read the blog|Advertise on this site