lkml.org 
[lkml]   [2011]   [Feb]   [7]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
 
Messages in this thread
/
Date
SubjectRe: Commit 500f7147cf5bafd139056d521536b10c2bc2e154 breaks _resume_
From
On Mon, Feb 7, 2011 at 12:48 PM, Jeff Chua <jeff.chua.linux@gmail.com> wrote:
> On Sun, Feb 6, 2011 at 11:27 PM, Chris Wilson <chris@chris-wilson.co.uk> wrote:
>> One last step: move contents of intel_crtc_reset() back to
>> intel_crtc_init() one by one.
>>
>> The active flag is my suspicion. I was thinking that we brought up the
>> outputs in a similar manner upon resume as upon initial boot. On
>> reflection, this is the not case.
>>
>> However, the first action we take inside modesetting is to disable the
>> outputs about to be reconfigured. So setting active should be the right
>> course of action so that cleanup any residual state from resume.
>>
>> So I am intrigued as to which line is the cause, and just where the
>> machine becomes unresponsive...
>
> It's this line causing the problem.
>
> intel_crtc->active = true; /* force the pipe off on setup_init_config */
>
>
> When it's called before entering intel_crtc_reset(&intel_crtc->base),
> it works, but if called within the function, it doesn't work. Strange.
> Not sure whether is passing the correct value to to_intel_crtc(crtc)?

I've added printk() below and the function returns a different value
of intel_crtc.


static void intel_crtc_reset(struct drm_crtc *crtc)
{
struct intel_crtc *intel_crtc = to_intel_crtc(crtc);
printk("intel_crtc %p\n", intel_crtc); ===> intel_crtc ffff8802349d1000

}

printk("intel_crtc %p\n", intel_crtc); ===> intel_crtc ffff8802349d0000
intel_crtc_reset(&intel_crtc->base);


Jeff


\
 
 \ /
  Last update: 2011-02-07 06:05    [W:0.122 / U:0.264 seconds]
©2003-2020 Jasper Spaans|hosted at Digital Ocean and TransIP|Read the blog|Advertise on this site