lkml.org 
[lkml]   [2011]   [Feb]   [4]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
 
Messages in this thread
/
Date
From
SubjectRe: [PATCH 4/4] workqueue: Remove now superfluous cancel_delayed_work() calls
Hello, Peter.

On Thu, Feb 03, 2011 at 06:45:41PM +0100, Peter Zijlstra wrote:
> On Thu, 2011-02-03 at 17:19 +0100, Tejun Heo wrote:
> > On Thu, Feb 03, 2011 at 03:09:44PM +0100, Peter Zijlstra wrote:
> > > Since queue_delayed_work() can now deal with existing timers, we don't
> > > need to explicitly call cancel_delayed_work() anymore.
> >
> > This is nice but there's small complication with the way
> > queue_delayed_work() behaves. If a delayed work item is already
> > pending, another queue_delayed_work() doesn't modify the delay whether
> > the new delay is longer or shorter than the current one. The previous
> > patch doesn't really change the behavior as the whole thing is gated
> > with WORK_STRUCT_PENDING_BIT.
> >
> > So, cancel_delayed_work() followed by queue_delayed_work() schedules
> > the work to be executed at the specified time regardless of the
> > current pending state while queue_delayed_work() takes effect iff
> > currently the work item is not pending.
>
> Right, I didn't think it would matter much, the difference is tiny. Only
> a small window between the timer triggering and the work getting
> scheduled has a different semantics, it used to be the same as before
> that window, now its like after that window.
>
> Since its all timing the code needs to deal with those cases anyway, no?

No, AFAICS the change from add_timer() to mod_timer() doesn't make any
difference. The control never reaches there if the work item is
already pending. Please consider the following two sequences.

seq1. queue_delayed_work(wq, dwork, 10*HZ);
cancel_delayed_work(dwork);
queue_delayed_work(wq, dwork, 5*HZ);

seq2. queue_delayed_work(wq, dwork, 10*HZ);
queue_delayed_work(wq, dwork, 5*HZ);

With or without the patch, dwork in seq1 will execute in 5 seconds,
and, again, with our without the patch dwork in seq2 will execute in
10 seconds, because queueing is gated by WORK_STRUCT_PENDING_BIT and
if the bit is already set the timer isn't modified at all.

IOW, those cancel_delayed_work()'s are there not because
queue_delayed_work() calls add_timer() instead of mod_timer().
They're there because queue_delayed_work() always uses the first
timeout duration and the users want to change it to a new value.

As I wrote before, I'm not a fan of the current behavior but that's
how it is currently. This patch series doesn't change the behavior
because the timers are guaranteed to be offline when
queue_delayed_work_on() calls add_timer(). To actually change the
behavior, queue_delayed_work_on() needs to be restructured and all its
users audited.

Thank you.

--
tejun


\
 
 \ /
  Last update: 2011-02-04 12:15    [W:0.051 / U:0.388 seconds]
©2003-2020 Jasper Spaans|hosted at Digital Ocean and TransIP|Read the blog|Advertise on this site