[lkml]   [2011]   [Feb]   [3]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
Messages in this thread
    SubjectRe: 2.6.38-rc3-git1: Reported regressions 2.6.36 -> 2.6.37
    On Thu, Feb 3, 2011 at 3:23 AM, Carlos R. Mafra <> wrote:
    > On Thu  3.Feb'11 at  1:03:41 +0100, Rafael J. Wysocki wrote:
    >> If you know of any other unresolved post-2.6.36 regressions, please let us know
    >> either and we'll add them to the list.  Also, please let us know if any
    >> of the entries below are invalid.
    > I'm sorry if I'm overlooking something, but as far as I can see the regression
    > reported here:
    > is not in the list (update on that report: reverting that commit on top of
    > 2.6.37 fixes the issue).

    Ok, added Keith and Dave to the cc, since they are the signers of that commit.

    > After some time, I also ended up finding an earlier report in the kernel bugzilla
    > which I think is the same regression (it was bisected to the same commit):
    > but I do not see it in the list either, even though it's marked as a
    > regression in the bugzilla.
    > The issue was also present in 2.6.38-rc2 last time I tested.

    Just to confirm, can you also check -rc3? I'm pretty sure nothing has
    changed, but there were a few drm patches after -rc2, so it's alsways
    good to double-check.


    To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
    the body of a message to
    More majordomo info at
    Please read the FAQ at

     \ /
      Last update: 2011-02-03 16:53    [W:0.021 / U:32.028 seconds]
    ©2003-2016 Jasper Spaans. hosted at Digital OceanAdvertise on this site