[lkml]   [2011]   [Feb]   [3]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
Messages in this thread
SubjectRe: 2.6.38-rc3-git1: Reported regressions 2.6.36 -> 2.6.37
On Thu, Feb 3, 2011 at 3:23 AM, Carlos R. Mafra <> wrote:
> On Thu  3.Feb'11 at  1:03:41 +0100, Rafael J. Wysocki wrote:
>> If you know of any other unresolved post-2.6.36 regressions, please let us know
>> either and we'll add them to the list.  Also, please let us know if any
>> of the entries below are invalid.
> I'm sorry if I'm overlooking something, but as far as I can see the regression
> reported here:
> is not in the list (update on that report: reverting that commit on top of
> 2.6.37 fixes the issue).

Ok, added Keith and Dave to the cc, since they are the signers of that commit.

> After some time, I also ended up finding an earlier report in the kernel bugzilla
> which I think is the same regression (it was bisected to the same commit):
> but I do not see it in the list either, even though it's marked as a
> regression in the bugzilla.
> The issue was also present in 2.6.38-rc2 last time I tested.

Just to confirm, can you also check -rc3? I'm pretty sure nothing has
changed, but there were a few drm patches after -rc2, so it's alsways
good to double-check.


To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to
More majordomo info at
Please read the FAQ at

 \ /
  Last update: 2011-02-03 16:53    [W:0.138 / U:3.440 seconds]
©2003-2018 Jasper Spaans|hosted at Digital Ocean and TransIP|Read the blog|Advertise on this site