lkml.org 
[lkml]   [2011]   [Feb]   [28]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
 
Messages in this thread
/
Date
From
SubjectRe: txqueuelen has wrong units; should be time
On Mon, Feb 28, 2011 at 05:48:14PM +0100, Eric Dumazet wrote:
> Le lundi 28 février 2011 à 11:11 -0500, John W. Linville a écrit :
> > On Sun, Feb 27, 2011 at 09:07:53PM +0100, Eric Dumazet wrote:
> >
> > > Qdisc should return to caller a good indication packet is queued or
> > > dropped at enqueue() time... not later (aka : never)
> > >
> > > Accepting a packet at t0, and dropping it later at t0+limit without
> > > giving any indication to caller is a problem.
> >
> > Can you elaborate on what problem this causes? Is it any worse than
> > if the packet is dropped at some later hop?
> >
> > Is there any API that could report the drop to the sender (at
> > least a local one) without having to wait for the ack timeout?
> > Should there be?
> >
>
> Not all protocols have ACKS ;)
>
> dev_queue_xmit() returns an error code, some callers use it.

Well, OK -- I agree it is best if you can return the status at
enqueue time. The question becomes whether or not a dropped frame
is worse than living with high latency. The answer, of course, still
seems to be a bit subjective. But, if the admin has determined that
a link should be low latency...?

John
--
John W. Linville Someday the world will need a hero, and you
linville@tuxdriver.com might be all we have. Be ready.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/

\
 
 \ /
  Last update: 2011-02-28 18:03    [from the cache]
©2003-2011 Jasper Spaans