lkml.org 
[lkml]   [2011]   [Feb]   [24]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
 
Messages in this thread
/
Date
From
SubjectRe: [PATCH 2/2] debugfs: only allow root access to debugging interfaces
Hi Greg,

On Tue, Feb 22, 2011 at 12:54:13PM -0800, Kees Cook wrote:
> On Tue, Feb 22, 2011 at 12:37:04PM -0800, Greg KH wrote:
> > On Tue, Feb 22, 2011 at 12:28:56PM -0800, Kees Cook wrote:
> > > On Tue, Feb 22, 2011 at 12:16:10PM -0800, Greg KH wrote:
> > > > On Tue, Feb 22, 2011 at 11:50:18AM -0800, Kees Cook wrote:
> > > > > On Tue, Feb 22, 2011 at 07:34:18PM +0000, Alan Cox wrote:
> > > > > > > What system do you proposed to keep these "stupid mistakes" from
> > > > > > > continuing to happen? If debugfs had already been mode 0700, we could have
> > > > > > > avoided all of these CVEs, including the full-blown local root escalation.
> > > > > >
> > > > > > And all sorts of features would have put themselves in sysfs instead and
> > > > > > broken no doubt.
> > > > > >
> > > > > > > The "no rules" approach to debugfs is not a good idea, IMO.
> > > > > >
> > > > > > It's a debugging fs, it needs to be "no rules" other than the obvious
> > > > > > "don't mount it on production systems"
> > > > >
> > > > > Okay, so the debugfs is not supposed to be mounted on a production system.
> > > >
> > > > No, not true at all, the "enterprise" distros all mount debugfs for good
> > > > reason on their systems.
> > >
> > > What reasons are those? Or better yet, why do you and Alan Cox disagree on
> > > this point?
> >
> > These distros have made the decision to support the perf interface,
> > which lives in debugfs, for their customers. I'm not saying that I
> > disagree with Alan about this, just pointing out the reality of the
> > situation here.
>
> A tool used only by the root user, so the proposed mount mode of 0700
> wouldn't break anything.

The summary is this:
- debugfs has been demonstrably dangerous to have available
- Alan Cox says that debugfs should not be used on production systems
- Greg KH does not disagree
- however, pref needs it, and this is used by some root users
- perf will likely move out of debugfs as some point

What is the objection, then, to making the root of debugfs mode 0600? All
the tools I reviewed that need it run as root (e.g. powertop). I've
already written, tested, and sent the patches -- they would not break
the requirements above.

-Kees

--
Kees Cook
Ubuntu Security Team


\
 
 \ /
  Last update: 2011-02-25 01:25    [W:0.057 / U:0.312 seconds]
©2003-2020 Jasper Spaans|hosted at Digital Ocean and TransIP|Read the blog|Advertise on this site