Messages in this thread | | | Date | Thu, 24 Feb 2011 09:55:12 -0500 (EST) | From | Alan Stern <> | Subject | Re: btusb autosuspend (was Re: Linux 2.6.38-rc6) |
| |
On Thu, 24 Feb 2011, Matthew Garrett wrote:
> On Wed, Feb 23, 2011 at 04:25:23PM -0800, Linus Torvalds wrote: > > Hmm. Is there any reason we shouldn't revert commit > > 556ea928f78a390fe16ae584e6433dff304d3014 given the regression? > > I think reverting makes sense at the moment. I haven't seen the reported > issues - I need to figure out if this is related to bus powered/self > powered devices, or what else is causing the difference. > > > It apparently had problems before too, and caused autosuspend to be > > disabled entirely, judging at least by > > > > https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=528744 > > > > but there's obviously the comment about "those should be fixed now". > > Apparently there are more issues. > > Right, we were autosuspending even when there were active connections. > Marcel told me that ought to be fixed and my testing seemed to agree... > > > I have no idea whether this is a USB-level issue, or a driver-level > > one. There are no comments about exactly what fixed the input device > > issues. So I'm adding both BT and USB people to the discussion. > > I'll try to get time to look at this this week. Marcel, any ideas?
Take a look at Bugzilla #26182. I tried adding your address to the CC: list, but the only address I could find that Bugzilla would accept wasn't the same as the addresses you normally use.
Alan Stern
| |